Jay Weber Show transcript 6-5-25
Oh boy: the leftists' bible-
The NY Times- is verifying that there is- in fact- a political realignment that has occurred in this country- due to Donald Trump.
Oh boy.
This is something that the democrats and their activists have been denying for nearly a decade, now.
I-and other right-wing pundits- were talking about this after November’s election: how every single county- except five or ten- shifted to the right in 2024.
Out of something like 3-thousand counties in this country- all but five or ten shifted toward republicans.
But no, no. That wasn’t evidence of a shift...the democrat’s election deniers wanted to argue.
That’s not significant. Trump’s win doesn’t represent a landslide or a mandate.
Yeah. It pretty much did.
So- six months later, now, the ‘butt hurt’ lefties at the NY Times finally decided to take a closer look. The paper just looked back at the last three elections-
They went back to 2016- when Trump beat Hillary-
And what they found is-
Over the last several presidential elections- going back to Hillary-
I was saying: if democrats can’t get 90 percent of the black vote, they are sunk.
Obama was the first black president, of course: there was all sorts of pent-up historical and racial demand for a national black candidate who could get a party’s nomination and win- and so- it’s not surprising that barrack Obama got 96 percent of the black vote.
Before Barry- the democrat candidates were getting about 92 percent of the black vote.
And so- knowing the demographics and how the insiders and strategists ‘teased this all out’...I’ve been saying-since 2016- if the democrat can’t get at least 90 percent of the black vote-they can’t win the election.
Well- kamala- got 85 percent: pathetic by a recent historical standard-and doubly pathetic because she’s a woman of color, herself.
During that same period of time: between 2012 and 2024- Hispanic support also fell dramatically for democrats: from 68 percent support...all the way down to just 54 percent.
My god, people: president trump nearly split the Latino vote with the democrats. That’s impressive.
He also nearly split the ‘youth vote’ with the democrats-given how many young men in this country have become disillusioned with the democrats-and sought out a better team to support.
Among Asians? -
Same story:over that twelve-year stretch-democrats lost 13 points among Asians...and sixteen points among Asian men.
Even the leftist deniers and Trump haters-at this point-are admitting that the trump coalition is real...and it has led to a significant voter shift in this country.
Now the question is: will this coalition of voters stay with the republicans longer term? Or are they ‘gone again’ once trump leaves office?
Can Donald Trump pass along this diverse coalition of voters to his successor? Or will they all go back to voting democrat once trump leaves office?
As you can imagine-every ‘expert’ insists they have an answer to this- and you aren’t going to be shocked to find out that- since virtually all of these pundits are democrats and left-leaning- hey-they’re all predicting that trump is an aberration. These voters and demos will flow back to the democrats in 28...etc.
But that’s wrong.
The only logical answer to the question: will this coalition of Trump voters stick with republicans? - it depends on whether they keep their promises and what sort of shape the country is in three years from now.
That is the only logical answer to that question: will America stick with Trump?
Well- it’s the same question we ask every four years with every president. And the answer is based on how things are going. How’s the economy doing. How impressive has this person been? What’s the overall standard of living? What are the top issues for voters?
The same set of democrat insiders is trying to figure out why and how the democrat party has lost so many black and Latino voters at one time.
Well- those answers aren’t difficult, either: I’ve been saying it repeatedly on this show: the democrats are on the wrong side of every 80/20 issue.
At some point- they’ve got to understand that.
What’s turning off voters or color?
Really?
Today’s democrat party is so woke, anti-family, anti-America, anti-prison, anti-education, anti-border, and anti-American worker. Large numbers of Americans of-all ethnicities want nothing to do with it anymore.
You’ve probably seen the ludicrous effort announced by the left to spent 20-million dollars doing a ‘deep dive’ into ‘what makes young men tick’?
How can democrats better talk the ‘language’ of young men...and lure them into the democrat party?
If you must ask what makes young men tick-you really are lost. And the democrat leaders are.
Which is why it wasn’t surprising to see some of the first moves related to this effort to ‘speak to men’.... literally be...to hire transgendered and fat women to oversee it.
I’m not kidding.Today’s democrat party is going to give all sorts of leftist, ugly women and ‘fake women’...all sorts of money to see what makes young men tick.
Good grief.
In all seriousness: none of these findings should be ‘news’ to any of these political strategists or our social scientists. Our young men have been feeling this way for ‘some time’.
But it explains why they voted for trump after 40-year high Biden inflation and seven percent mortgage rates became the norm. Doesn’t it?
And it explains why trump, and JD Vance, and joe rogan, and Theo Von...etc... appeal to them as male role models...doesn’t it?
Sadly, most of our young men under the age of 30 or 35 have grown up in a culture and an educational system that has had them taking a back seat to girls-
Because left wing educators decided that it was the ‘girls’ who needed to be empowered. Not the boys.
And a huge part of that effort was to literally ‘emasculate’ and neuter boys culturally. Insist that every one of them was a potential predator...and had a lesser value...and needed to be silenced, controlled, or taught not to even have a crush on a girl...or show a woman affection. Without being accused of a sexual violation.
Moreover- the ‘examples’ of the sort of men they should be- literally became ‘pajama boy’...who was shown in his little fleece pajamas sipping cocoa from a cup that he needed both hands to hold up...
Jeez- Louise.
Well-consider that today’s democrats have such a bizarre idea of what a real man is- or what’s manly- that they had Kamala Harris add Tim Walz to the ticket...because he was the ‘manliest’ guy they could find. He was going to speak to men!
The guy pretended to hunt and fish but walked around in clean Carhart jackets...and who leg-kicked and danced and did jazz hands onto the stage at rallies.
Good grief.
Democrats really don’t know why they lost men.
Maybe it’s because Brittany Griner and Ru Paul are the closest thing to ‘male’ that today’s average democrat ever wants to get!
‘We don’t know how to talk to men’.
You don’t know what a man is!!
photo credit: Getty Images
audio version of the segment here > East coast liberals finally admit there's a shift towards the right